Humbled

In the weeks leading up to my show's reception, anxiety crept in and put me in a choke hold. This wasn't the annoying bear hug variety my big brother used to give, followed by a noogie but all delivered violently and released quickly because, we don't want this to look like he's hugging his stupid sister. No, not that kind of choke hold. THIS anxiety took the sort of hold you might associate with straight jackets, a numbed neurotic state, and confinement in pale, padded rooms with soft moans filtering through the walls, but wait, not filtering through the walls, coming out of your own parted, pallid lips.  Yeah. That kind.

I couldn't paint. I couldn't write. I didn't want to talk about the show. I didn't want to see the work in the gallery. I didn't want to set the actual menu or grocery shop or even make any of that promised food. I didn't want to show up. Frankly, I was paralyzed with fear at the thought of being in the SAME room at the SAME time as you AND my work. It was the combination that was lethal. Like waking up especially early AND waking up to find no coffee in the house. Both are very survivable conditions, but please dear god, may they never occur simultaneously.

But back to this art thing. Sure, I like to be with my work. Sure, I like to be with you. But really, the two shouldn't meet up for a mixer. Because- and here's the news flash- you don't have to like my work and you just might not!  Sharing a room with you AND my work seemed synonymous with performing amazing feats of pleasantries and magical tricks with euphemisms all to avoid the possibility that once you've seen my work you're going to have to hate me.

And only because I had promised, did I finally drag myself into the gallery for the first time a full week after the show was hung.  I was thankful to mostly be alone and with strangers. Few people who came in knew that the awkward lady standing in the room had made the work. What a relief to be anonymous, to not have to respond. I could pose as if a fellow observer, nod my head as if in quiet, calculated consideration of their comments.  I could collude with "Yes, what was she thinking?!" or "Hmm, yeah, that is rather neat-o. Take a pic!" Or, I could act as if I was just there for the free wine. 

But the next night. The next night I couldn't act. The next night, the room was filled with YOU. Familiar faces flooded, the introductions tripped of my tongue of the most important people in my life. My mind dizzied with the efforts people made to come out, vision astounded by surprise arrivals: You came?! You! And you! My hands busied with a hug here, a hail and hearty thump there on that shoulder, a pull of cheeks close for kissing. Into my ears poured the richness of "so good to see you," "how are you", "I'm so glad you're here", lyrics of our alliances, refrains of shared histories. Suddenly I realized the whole night was about YOU.  Let's be honest, nobody was really talking about the work. 

It wasn't all about me. It... the reception for this work... was about you. I'm not trying to make you self-conscious here. I'm still definitely talking about myself. What mattered most in the room was the work I had made with you, our relationships.  Our conversations were about neighbors and small worlds, and swimming practice and necklaces, and new houses and children, and vacations, and holiday stress eating and fly fishing and birdwatching and the weather... all of this in a continued effort to be connected.

I had to look up from my navel gazing. To keep on would have required the worst of pride, the vainest of egos. I had to abandon that adolescent self who, even in the limelight of an admiring gaggle might persist in whining "Oh my gawd, how's my outfit?! If he doesn't just totally go for me, then like I'm going to just totally die!" (And here, I'm totally fantasizing since as an adolescent I was only ever in the gaggle, not the limelight.) Heads up, Ditz-for-Brains, I wanted to shout as I did in high school. All these people love you!  It was a shocking, jolting, humbling thought to realize that what you cared about that night was me, and all that I cared about was you.  The art just sort of hung around.

Speaking of my pride and my ego followed by the verb humbling, let me clarify that I'm not implying that I was let down by the reception. In fact, I'm sure it didn't do much of anything to knock me down a notch or two.  Believe me, just painting and writing about my painting was enough exposure to chop me off at the knees. And if that wasn't enough to cut me down to size, being a mother surely is. My inadequacies were laid bare long ago.

So, more simply what I mean when I say I am recently humbled is that I was (re)acquainted with where I belong in the grand scheme of things; I am grounded, but I am not necessarily eating dirt*.  Being with you all during the evening of the reception reminded me of my place.  My place is with you. My place... my kitchen table, the gallery..... having it filled with you, is what truly matters.  So, thank you for helping me out of the Pain Cave, the padded room of my anxiety.  I'm glad to be with you. And thank you for letting my art hang out with us too.

*An important distinction, as you'll recognize that like human, humble has the Latin root humus, for "ground" or "earth". Cool. I just let my OED Freak Flag fly.

 

 

 

A Night to Remember

What could kick start a better celebration than filling the house inside and out with loved ones?!

What could kick start a better celebration than filling the house inside and out with loved ones?!

Even my grandmother (upper left in black and white) was able to come!

Even my grandmother (upper left in black and white) was able to come!

Heaven: a beer in hand; a kitchen full of food and friends! Disregard what may look like a pained facial expression. What was more likely was that I was actually singing a hymn here.

Heaven: a beer in hand; a kitchen full of food and friends! Disregard what may look like a pained facial expression. What was more likely was that I was actually singing a hymn here.

Because there's not adequate words to really describe her, I'll simply say, here is my best friend Carla.

Because there's not adequate words to really describe her, I'll simply say, here is my best friend Carla.

On to the business of the evening: the venerable John Natsoulas at work.

On to the business of the evening: the venerable John Natsoulas at work.

Friends of all generations! 

Friends of all generations! 

She did an interpretive dance for my joy!

She did an interpretive dance for my joy!

Was I explaining again how my 4 year old thought my pants were ridiculous? "Mom, THAT is not an outfit!" he declared after I'd dressed for the reception. See Son, there are are a few things you need to know about your mother's fashion sense...

Was I explaining again how my 4 year old thought my pants were ridiculous? "Mom, THAT is not an outfit!" he declared after I'd dressed for the reception. See Son, there are are a few things you need to know about your mother's fashion sense...

Speaking of women who DO live and breath elegance: here I am honored to stand beside Judith Kays, a fabulous art educator and critic who has been working in the Bay Area for over 50 years.  She wrote the in depth analysis of my work for the cat…

Speaking of women who DO live and breath elegance: here I am honored to stand beside Judith Kays, a fabulous art educator and critic who has been working in the Bay Area for over 50 years.  She wrote the in depth analysis of my work for the catalog.

A dear decade-long friend who voyaged many hours to surprise me with her attendance! My daughter, who got to stay up past her bedtime!

A dear decade-long friend who voyaged many hours to surprise me with her attendance! My daughter, who got to stay up past her bedtime!

My father (left) the reception's caterer and original underwriter. And my husband (right), the more current financier. 

My father (left) the reception's caterer and original underwriter. And my husband (right), the more current financier. 

At Harbor

Untitled, in progress. 2015. Oil on panel. 18 x 24 inches. 

Untitled, in progress. 2015. Oil on panel. 18 x 24 inches. 

People fear leaving their safe harbor of the known and venturing off into the unknown. Human beings crave certainty- even when it limits them. ~Robin S. Sharma

Empty Nest, revisited

I learned something exquisite: it does matter to me where my works go. Knowing they're in a good place is such a relief!  Maybe it's like visiting your kid at college, checking out the dorm, the bunkmates, the boyfriend, seeing that she's eating enough, and finding out that it's all really going great for her.  You can go home to the quiet that still seems surreal and have some sweet relief.  

The Buddah-Wanna-Be who lives in my belly mutters tones of acceptance and peace like a monk leading a retreat, but believe you me, there's plenty of other voices, sometimes quiet sometimes loud: a strident protestor; a sad miser with a hungry dog at her feet. They sit on the temple steps waving their posters or approach visitors with their clipboards:

What are the chances her work ends up in the dumpster during a remodel? If you could go back and make that financial choice again would you: a) take a trip to Pittsburg this winter; b) choose to go to Disneyland; or c) have three great sessions with your therapist?  Or, where would you most like to see this work: at PG&E headquarter's lobby or as playing cards?

A couple weeks ago I received a text from sweet friends who sent a photo of two of my works propped casually on the gallery floor with this precious title: these are all ours! xoxoxo. The instant I read that my whole being lifted in joy. It really did.  

For longer I've know that a few pieces are going to other friends' homes: two are full of children and their morning scrabbles and evening snuggles; other homes are quiet, including one that holds two of the most accepting, wise, and curious people I know. These purchases were more foreshadowed, and also the presence of commissioned pieces are loitering. While very gratified, when I stare at a blank panel with full consideration of the homes and lives of the people for whom I work, my efforts take on an intensified determination: oh please, let this be my offering that adds meaning to their lives. 

However swiftly they happen, the moves of my works into these loved ones' homes comes with peace and certain joy for me.  I find myself imagining what the paintings will be experiencing and feel blessed that there is a piece of me that will share in that: my toes stand in the tide as waves of love roll off these people's hugs at their doors; when they speak kindly to one another, certainly the warmth will radiate into my corner; when a child laughs with surprise or when guests listen with rapt curiosity, I too share in the energetic gusts.  A piece of me will bear it when tears and rage fly.  I'll be collecting the dust as their skins wear off in the day to day bustle of life.  What better place to let pieces of myself live, than in the midst of these people who I love? To know where some of myself IS does matter.  

The rest I have to let go. Like a farewell blessing for my college kid who's set on globe-trotting- maybe I should kiss each piece when it leaves my garage. Maybe I'll get a postcard, maybe not. Maybe she'll call at Christmas. I pray he doesn't get hurt. I pray that someone loves them and they feel loved.

 

Hey Punk, Join the Jazz Band

Terry and I heated one winter night with a conversation about how to really make “interesting art”. He defined this category as one requiring the artist to “just go wild”. He detailed examples of works that he feels are successful and how they contain random insertions, juxtapositions, methods and images that contradict and challenge.  Sure, little old me with my pink sunsets got a little defensive.  

To be honest I entered into the conversation with guns ablaze, having been fired up by reading this article by Adam Gopnick about sociologist Howard Becker's theories of social deviants. I felt far, far away from being as cool as a Deviant and rather more like a Novitiate, crawling on my knees into the artistic world. I am currently holding a begging bowl trying to prove my worth, wanting to be granted a coveted identity and perhaps some monetary reward; being a bit obsequious; taking a few requests; leaning into humility. Gopnick says that “to enter [the art] field at all is possible for outsiders only if they learn to repeat the words that construct its values.”  I may be willing to mumble a guru's mantras and say three Hail Mary's, but let me be clear: I'm lying in wait. 

What came through this winter's conversation was a multitude of questions that influence the end product of an artist: who gets the title of "artist"?; who has the power to define what is "art"?; what is "interesting" vs. "novelty" vs. "aesthetically pleasurable"?; how do we value "novelty-based" art once the polish wears off?; what is the value of pure aesthetic pleasure?; is it possible still to make something "brand new"?

I used Becker's theories to argue that we have specific roles to play on whatever stage we act; there are rules to follow. As an striving artist, I defended the need to, at times, toe the line of “status quo” by making acceptable art. It feels to me that broad audiences don’t respect artists who can't also prove they have recognizable skill with their media before spitting on the rules and throwing in their wrenches. Sure, we'll talk about them, we give them our attention when startled- but strangeness doesn't have a lasting power in our brains.  We create long-standing meaning in our lives through context, and to have context "acceptability" and "respectability" come into play. Randomness and juxtaposition alone aren't that meaningful.

It seems to me that visual artists have to prove some mettle- and that usually means having some ability to parrot "Polly Wants A Cracker" a few times and step in line within the parade before beginning their delicately orchestrated secession. They might sweetly begin to harmonize, before leading a riff or insisting on an improv set; this happens before they can pause the track, scratch as the needle drags across the record, and shout out their own new song.

Becker might like my musical metaphor as he said, "Like reefer-smoking among jazz musicians, art making was not the business of solitary artists, inspired by visions, but a social enterprise in which a huge range of people played equally essential roles in order to produce an artifact that a social group decided to dignify as art."

Here's where my ideas of relying on others' for my title of "artist" is also supported by Becker's work. He writes: 

A ‘world’ as I understand it consists of real people who are trying to get things done, largely by getting other people to do things that will assist them in their project… The resulting collective activity is something that perhaps no one wanted, but is the best everyone could get out of this situation and therefore what they all, in effect, agreed to.

Becker spends a lot of time using a cinema metaphor for these interconnected relationships; that a movie is made through the teamwork of a myriad of people and their skills, resulting in an artwork that is an amalgamated vision. But what about people who strive daily in earnest towards perfection, and seemingly with little assistance? How about a housewife's efforts that are discovered at a garage sale, or a hermit's profound writings discovered posthumously? What of the person who cultivates ignorance so as to appear unbiased and independent? 

It feels like, looks like, is just like being alone- but what of the trail of choices we’ve followed? Who made the trail? Where does it lead behind and before us? How quickly and with what diversions will we choose to travel?  More to the point: what choices have we made, what choices have others made, to put us into these positions, influence our actions and our products? Personally, I feel at times like the American Beauty plastic bag: I am my own entity but certainly one under particular influences, or confluences of influences. 

So, I'm not able to don my sandwich board and stand on a street corner shouting: HOT OFF THE PRESS: THIS, MY, MINE ALONE! THIS MY NEW IDEA! I'm a part of a crowd who posits that extraordinary novelty only exists in a world that is regionalized, and narrowly contextualized. An impression of "newness" and "uniqueness" is created by having a perspective that is very limited historically and/or geographically. Babies are the only people who think for a brief time that "something comes from nothing"; they're the only ones honestly surprised around here!  As we age we are much more equipped and ready to see connections and equations, how things come about.  

Our increased awareness of what has been made around the world, how and why, means that there is often more likely a sense of "reference" or "appropriation". Case in point: the work of Europe's 19th and 20th century artists, from The Masters to the Cubist and Surrealist rebels, doesn't feel that surprising to contemporary viewers. We have an even broader understanding than those artists' own contemporaries of the larger contexts of their work, and even still we can greatly value and admire deeply their end results. What made these artists so special? What made their attempts feel so novel? The world was just about ready for their small twists to the game, and that's when the artists jumped in and said "Let's Play": their "talents" were a socially-acceptable amount of novelty.  Their genius has something to do with good timing. 

As a novelty spreads, its impact dims into the mundane. Likewise the wider and farther we look the greater number and variety of artists we have to acknowledge.  (Might that mean too, the title of "artist" isn't really that unique?) Today, mere pockets of extreme localism exists, except in certain American political parties and very isolated tribes, I dare say. Our narrowness is blown out by our global, instant connectedness, access to shared pots of resources, images, language, and values.  So, how shall we make "interesting" art?  Is "just going wild" just a way to manipulate attention?  And after we have the attention, what important thing shall we say with our work?

In a Perverse Way

Somethings just don't work out. Here are two examples: 

2015-06-15 12.40.59.jpg

I never wanted to accurately paint a tree in either case. But my original intentions for both of these pieces are buried under layers and layers of paint. (I'm sure you can tell which works these became.)

I'm letting these trees stand, but I'm going to keep swinging my ax 'til I get me a fine log!, said Ms. Environmental Steward raised at the feet of Paul Bunyon

As my hero Diebenkorn said, "Attempt what is not certain," and "Be careful only in a perverse way."

 

She Turns a Corner

She Turns a Corner

Another set of blog posts in which the artist does quite a bit of navel-gazing, which may be fascinating for its social-oddity but annoyingly cliche and egotistical anyway. And in which she compares herself to a mother kicking her offspring to the curb, and to Rocky Balboa. Also, some bits about sacred grounds and a road to the dump.

Read More

Down in the Dumps, But You Don't "look" Sad?!

For several reasons, CR29 Eastward, Blues is one of my favorites. Although there is nearly an equal division of land and sky, the colors bleed into one another: the blues of a clearer dawn sky above the sun-lit clouds echo those lavender shades of the paved road; the yellows of that sky are reflected in the haze hovering above the ground and the stripes in the road. The horizon therefore is lost. We'd like to find that line, to think in black and white but no separation is simple and clear. The cynic in me also likes how this beautiful road leads the public to only to one place: the county dump.

CR 29 Eastward, Blues. 2015. Oil on panel. 18 x 23.5 inches. 

CR 29 Eastward, Blues. 2015. Oil on panel. 18 x 23.5 inches.